The court orders, mandating that the dad not discuss details of the case, were issued after the B. The judge reminded the dad of the bans on the names of the parties in the case and said he had violated the orders. Court of Appeal in January upheld a ruling allowing the medical treatments to go ahead. Material posted online by Smith also violated the bans by naming the father and the medical professionals, she said. Tammen issued his orders Wednesday after submissions from the parties, including lawyer Sarah Chaster, who told him that the dad had given interviews that were posted online on multiple platforms and which had violated the bans. Do you understand that part of it? The judge warned the dad that if there are any further breaches of the bans and court orders, the lawyers for the teen might come back to court and seek to have him cited for contempt of court and face serious consequences. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings. She said an interview posted Feb.
© 2020 flowindsurfing.com - All rights reserved. All Models are over 21 y.o.